The Effect of Oral Motor Stimulation on the Transition to Full Oral Feeding, Breastfeeding, and Length of Hospital Stay in Preterm Infants.

Objective: To determine the effect of oral motor stimulation (OMS) applied to preterm infants on their sucking and swallowing abilities to establish a successful and safe oral feeding experience. Methods: A pre-post intervention study was conducted between December 2019 and December 2020, which included preterm infants born at <35 weeks of gestational age and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Patients with major congenital abnormalities (including cardiac, facial, and jaw deformities), severe NEC, stage 3-4 IVH were excluded from the study. Patients who received OMS by a speech and language therapist between June 2020 and December 2020 were assigned to Group 1, while patients who received no intervention between December 2019 and May 2020 were assigned to Group 2. The time to achieve full oral feeding (FOF), acquisition of breastfeeding rates at discharge, and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 62 patients were included in the study (31 in Group 1 and 31 in Group 2). There were no significant differences in birth weight and demographic data between the groups. The mean time to achieve FOF was found to be significantly shorter in Group 1 (31 ± 23.6 and 46.7 ± 22.3 days, respectively, p = 0.013). The mean LOS was also found to be shortened with a mean duration of 10 days in Group 1, without statistical significance (56.4 ± 35.3 days versus 66.0 ± 42.9 days, respectively, p = 0.34). Acquisition of breastfeeding rates was significantly higher in the intervention group (p < 0.05) Conclusions: OMS accelerates the transition to FOF in preterm infants and increases the rates of acquiring breastfeeding skills at discharge.

Effect of Nonnutritive Sucking on Oral Feeding in Neonates With Perinatal Asphyxia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

AIMS: The effect of nonnutritive sucking (NNS) stimulation is unclear in infants with perinatal asphyxia. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the effect of NNS stimulation on oral intake, discharge time, and early feeding skills in infants with perinatal asphyxia. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study was conducted. METHOD: Of the 94 infants, 47 were included in the experimental group and given NNS stimulation once a day before tube feeding by a speech-language therapist (SLT) in addition to hypothermia treatment. Infants' feeding performances on the days of first oral intake and discharge were evaluated with the Early Feeding Skills Scale (EFS). RESULTS: The time from tube feeding to oral intake was significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group (p < .05). EFS scores at discharge were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p < .05). There was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of discharge and weight gain (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that the NNS stimulation positively affected oral intake and early feeding skills in infants with perinatal asphyxia, as in preterms. However, NNS stimulation had no significant effect on discharge and weight gain in infants with asphyxia. This finding may be attributed to other factors. It is recommended to use NNS by an SLT in a neonatal intensive care unit within a multidisciplinary team to accelerate the transition to oral feeding and improve feeding skills in infants with perinatal asphyxia. Further studies on the effect of NNS stimulation in infants with perinatal asphyxia are needed to corroborate its effects on discharge time and weight gain.